|
...building the libertarian future...
...through practical politics...
|
| Username: |
Forwarder |
| PersonId: |
8 |
| Created: |
Sat Jun 27, 2009 at 08:44:40 AM MDT |
Forwarder's RSS Feed
|
|
Wed Mar 03, 2010 at 20:56:46 PM MST
|
|
Forwarder forwards from Scott Williamson and the February 2010 issue of Liberty for America magazine an article on siting of our national office.
When I moved my family from Michigan to Nashville three years ago one of the decisions we had to make was where we were going to live. We could have chosen to live in the heart of the action and moved to a loft in down town Nashville. We chose to spend half as much and move to a neighborhood. Sure, when we go to see a ball game or attend a play we have to fight traffic and drive downtown. In the long run, by living away from downtown we free up thousands of dollars a year to spend on other things.
If you run a business or run a household you know that we make economic decisions daily. Often the issue is not how much you spend; it is how you are spending it. By spending money on one thing you now have less to spend on other things. This is a lesson Libertarians have been trying to teach government for years.
In order for the Libertarian Party to have moral authority to teach this lesson it is imperative that we make sure as a party we are wisely spending our own money. Federal Election Commission December report shows the LNC pay's $10,928.89 a month for office space. To put this into some perspective, a sustaining member pays $25.00 annually for their membership; it takes over 437 sustaining members a month to pay the rent on our Washington, D.C office. If you are a sustaining member, it took you and 5,245 others to pay the rent on our national office in 2009.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 404 words in story)
|
|
Sat Feb 13, 2010 at 18:40:31 PM MST
|
Challenge:
Getting actual voters (Libertarian, Republican, Democratic and Independent) to actually cast their ballots for Libertarian Candidates
Solutions:
Instead of telling ourselves why voters SHOULD vote for our candidates, we need to honestly and objectively ask ourselves why voters DON'T vote for us; We MUST keep in mind that NO voters owes any party or candidate their vote. It is up to the Parties and candidates to earn those votes.
Evaluate our candidates on how they present themselves to the public to determine why, from the very beginning of each campaign, voters perceive our candidates as fringe people who the voters would not WANT to represent them;
We need to create either offices or staff positions at all levels of 'Election Coordinators'. They would be responsible for active outreach to our candidates and potential candidates, not merely to advise the candidates but also to be an active clearing house for all necessary legal advise for running campaigns, for being a central recipient who all necessary local and state documents and forms (including ethics compliance forms and other requirements beyond the simple act of turning in filing documents). Their job will be to PRO-ACTIVELY ensure that our candidates have every document they need, to make sure that all documents are properly filed with the appropriate agencies, to make sure that general Libertarian Party materials are sent to the candidates, to develop relationships with service providers (such as printers) who will reduce the cost of their services for coordinated services for candidates throughout a county, district, or state; etc. Election coordinators should also be able to act as a "booking agent" who will actively find engagements for our candidates to speak at and for event coordinators to contact to arrange for candidates to speak at their events. Election coordinators would also help candidates to set up and conduct fundraising events, as well as ensure that any such event conforms with their state's laws and election codes.
We MUST examine our messages to the voters and the public. The far-right, "I hate even the very idea of government" anarchists and objectivists can strike those voters who are not ALREADY in agreement with the"down will all governments" philosophies as nihilist with no actual plan for how to even develop a plan for gradually moving us in that direction. The vast majority of Americans do not WANT, and are not comfortable with the IDEA of a complete absence of government. It scares them. If we ever want MAINSTREAM voters to hear us and give us any chances to show what we could do in office, we must be willing and able to be a Party with a wide spectrum of right to left political ideologies AND able to present even the extreme ends of our Party in ways that will not cause mainstream voters to simply write all LP candidates off as members of a lunatic fringe.
In the races with no opposition from one of the two major Parties, our leadership needs to work with the leadership of the other Parties to get their support as an alternative when they have no candidates in a particular race. In races with no LP candidates, we should help support candidates who are friendly with our goals and objectives.
We MUST make redistricting a major part of the message of ALL of our candidates in 2010. Until and unless the states develop politically neutral, non-partisan districts, neither us nor any other third-party movement will have a chance to become significant participants in our governments.
Rhys Blavier is a libertarian author writing from Tomayor, Texas. Rhys Blavier extends his profound thanks to Angela Keaton (AntiWar.Com) and Lee Wrights (LibertyForAll.net), and encourages others to support their long-time and dedicated work and their effort to support the cause of liberty and freedom and the advancement of the libertarian philosophy. This article is Copyright 2010 by Rhys Blavier and reproduced by permission.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Sat Jan 30, 2010 at 19:01:34 PM MST
|
|
Forwarder writes: Rachel Hawkridge is a Regional Representative and Washington State Chair. She writes
We desperately need a National Chair who focuses on supporting activism, recruiting candidates, and raising money. We desperately need a National Chair who focuses on administration, not someone who will continue factional conflicts.
We desperately need a National Chair who welcomes all into the party - Radicals, Reformers, Minarchists, Anarchists, Centrists, Pagans, Christians, sex workers in fabulous costumes and professional business people in three-piece suits -- but who insists that it is libertarians who will guide our party's direction.
I am endorsing and supporting the one man who will focus on these goals - and who is committed to supporting candidates. Candidate support should be our primary mission. No longer will our budget allot zero for candidate support.
My candidate sees the value and necessity of educational outreach, not to mention collaboration with outside groups when we agree on issues.
That's why I endorse and support Dr. George Phillies for National Chair. Please join me.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Sat Jan 30, 2010 at 09:08:18 AM MST
|
|
...A Short Guide for New State Chairs
Our Libertarian National Committee is composed of four National Officers and five At-Large members, chosen by all delegates at the National Convention, and eight or nine Regional Representatives, chosen by groups of states.
A Region is entitled to have a Regional Representative if at least 10% of the party's members live in the region, two Representatives, if 20% of the members live in the region, and so forth. California, by itself, can be a region, because >10% of our members live in California, but other states must group together to form a region. The actual number of Regional Representatives is determined by how states agree to form Regions, but historically there have been eight or nine Regional Representatives.
Region formation is entirely voluntary by the states agreeing to form the Region. There are no Bylaws assigning states to regions. You get to form Regions every two years, during the three months before the National Convention, though you can negotiate the details in advance. You make your agreement, the State parties all sign the agreement, and you have a Region. If you choose not to join a region, or if your State Party does not get around to joining a Region in time, you can be an independent State.
If you do not agree to do something else, at some point during the National Convention the delegates from the states in the region get together and elect their Regional Representative and the Regional Alternate. These meetings have sometimes been held in front of the elevators; informing delegates about them has sometimes been a bit haphazard. You don't have to do it that way.
You can plan out in advance which states are or are not in your region. You are under no obligation to stay in your current region. In forming a "double region", you may find that the natural division of states (say, the current region 5 North and South) divides so that one end has >10% of the members, the other end has <10% of the members, but you can still agree that the delegates from the two halves of the region each separately choose a Regional Representative.
Everything else can be done by mutual agreement of the states involved, so long as the details are specified in the formation agreement, such as agreements as to how many votes each state gets in choosing a Representative or Alternate, where the Representative and Alternate must come from, how the Representative and Alternate may be replaced, etc.
It is always sensible to look at the Region you might be joining and ask whether the Region makes sense, and whether the credible choices of Regional Representative are acceptable. For example, if your Regional Representative has never contacted your state or filed a report in the LNC Minutes about what is happening in your Region, you might want to consider what you want to do.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Sat Jan 23, 2010 at 08:30:39 AM MST
|
|
Forwarder writes: The DCC is the Donor Confidentiality Committee, formed by the LNC at its last meeting to deal with issues related to pubic representations as to Lee Wrights' membership status by the LNC, in the form of its Treasurer. Mary Ruwart has written a minority report dealing with that Committee's findings, including a detailed description of the peculiar path the Committee followed in generating its report. Because the Minority report is a bit complex, we open with a summary taken from Liberty for America magazine
Minority Report of the
Donor Confidentiality Committee
We now turn to Mary Ruwart's minority report to the Libertarian National Committee from the LNC ad hoc Donor Confidentiality Committee. The report is a bit long, so a short summary is in order.
Readers will recall that last Spring an effort was made to remove Lee Wrights from the National Committee, based on claims that he was not or had ceased to be a sustaining member of the National Party. During the affaire, claims about Mr. Wrights membership status, in the form of a memo from Aaron Starr, appeared on IndependentPoliticalReport.com. According to Ruwart's report, the memo made a number of claims about Wrights that have not been substantiated and that were damaging to Lee Wrights.
At the Summer LNC Meeting, the LNC formed a Donor Confidentiality Committee to make recommendations to the LNC for protecting the good names of its donors. Chairman Redpath appointed to the committee Mary Ruwart, and then Mark Hinkle, Stuart Flood, M Carling,...and Aaron Starr, whose memorandum was the proximate justification for forming the committee.
The conduct of the committee, as described in the Minority Report, may be characterized as 'interesting'. Apparently Messrs. Carling and Starr wrote a 'final report', vetted by Mr. Flood, which they shared with Mr. Hinkle, but not with the fifth Committee member, Dr. Ruwart. There was allegedly a conference call to approve the report. According to Ruwart, Starr demanded that Hinkle exclude Ruwart from the conference call, Ruwart writing:
"When I told Mr. Hinkle that I was available for the meeting, he told me that I could not participate because Mr. Starr had specifically asked that I be excluded until the document was "finalized." When I pointed out that he, as Committee Chair, could overrule Mr. Starr's request, Mr. Hinkle said he was unwilling to do so because he felt beholden to Mr. Starr for preparing the report. Although Mr. Hinkle did not appreciate being excluded from earlier meetings, he was quite willing to continue to exclude me."
And now, below the fold, the actual report:
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 3078 words in story)
|
|
Sat Jan 23, 2010 at 08:16:36 AM MST
|
|
Forwarder: With thanks to our friends in Massachusetts for supplying us with the following:
Kennedy Took 22,237 Votes. That's up 68% from our 2008 top-of-ticket Barr / Root Presidential team and their 13,189 votes. Joe's best towns were 4% in Hawley and 3% in Huntington, Ware, Monroe, New Salem, and Rowe.
Below the fold: A personal thank-you from Joe Kennedy to all his supporters.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 590 words in story)
|
|
Sun Jan 10, 2010 at 07:30:40 AM MST
|
|
Forwarder quotes from the excellent Libertarian Party of Metro Nashville and Davidson County(Tennessee) web site http://LPMNDC.org , reporting on their yearly caucus:
The Libertarian Party of Metro Nashville and Davidson County unanimously voted to endorse Scott Williamson for Libertarian National Committee Regional Representative at the 2010 annual caucus. Williamson has served the last year as the Secretary / Treasurer of the Libertarian Party of Metro Nashville and Davidson County and was recently re-elected to that position. Williamson has worked as the Chair of Outright Libertarians of Nashville and has done a great job reaching out and spreading the message of liberty to the GLBT community in our area.
Williamson is more than an activist. His endless energy, commitment to the party, and his organizational skills make him highly qualified to be our Regional Representative to the LNC. We, the Libertarian Party of Metro Nashville Davidson County believe he will do an excellent job and wholeheartedly endorse him.
The caucus concluded with a straw poll of the candidates running for LNC Chair. The caucus used a instant runoff preferred ranking ballot.
George Phillies came in first place.
Ernest Hancock came in second place
Mark Hinkle and NOTA tied for third place
Wayne Allen Root came in fifth place.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Thu Jan 07, 2010 at 05:35:02 AM MST
|
(AuGeo writes: Note that there is a poll. - promoted by AuGeo)
Forwarder writes: Michael Seebeck here announces his campaign to be elected to the Libertarian National Committee as the Regional Representative from California.
http://www.facebook.com/group....
http://www.facebook.com/notes/...
Fellow Californians,
After a lot of consulting, consideration, and discussion with both family and colleagues within the Party, I am announcing my candidacy for LNC Regional Representative for Region 2, serving California.
These past two years have seen the LNC in turmoil and the LPCA in growth, and the next 3 years are OUR time. It is time to restore strong and principled leadership to the LNC and to continue that growth in California. As the largest state affiliate and the only single-state region, California's role on the LNC is unique. We've seen their turmoil and its impacts on our state, and it is past time to end it and move forward with doing the jobs we have pledged our time, our money, our sweat, our tears, and even our blood-using the political process to advocate, create, and move towards a libertarian society. Great progress has been made, but it is time to build on that and grow nationally, and to continue our growth in California. THIS IS OUR TIME! We need to make the most of it. Voters are angry, and we MUST tap into that for our success, at all levels.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 865 words in story)
|
|
Wed Jan 06, 2010 at 21:56:34 PM MST
|
(Below the fold, there is a poll of the National Chair candidates. - promoted by AuGeo)
Forwarder writes: George Phillies is Treasurer of the Massachusetts Party and a declared candidate for National Chair. He proposes:
We start moving in the right direction by putting our Libertarian party on the New Path, the path to Libertarian Renewal.
Just imagine if every election campaign included a Libertarian candidate. Just imagine if we were the majority party. Just imagine if our sound social and financial policies restored true American greatness, the greatness of being the country that offers its people more freedom and more prosperity than any where else. Just imagine if our wise foreign and domestic policies made America once again that shining city on the sunlit hill, the country whose very existence signifies peace, liberty, and opportunity.
That's wonderful to imagine. How do we get there?
Every journey begins with a first step. The journey may be long. Some of us may not live to reach our destination. But if we do not take the first steps on our journey, none of us will ever reach it.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 649 words in story)
|
|
Sat Jan 02, 2010 at 06:47:30 AM MST
|
|
It's a bit unusual, and a welcome sight, but the Boston Globe two days back picked up a Libertarian National Committee press release and treated it at positive news.
http://www.boston.com/news/pol...
The Globe has historically focused its coverage on Democratic and Republican party positions.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Fri Jan 01, 2010 at 17:10:07 PM MST
|
|
In addition to the FEC reports, the National Committee has internal financials mailed to members. A copy of these financials reached this magazine, not from the LNC mailing operation.
Of course, book-keeping rules readily lead to all sorts of outcomes, so it is not surprising that the two sets of financial reports do not agree with each other, but the two reports do present two different perspectives on the same pile of cash. For example, FEC reports are by date, while these financials are by month, and pay dates are shown when people are paid (FEC reports) or are accrued when they work (LNC financials), but if you decide to spend money up to the limit of income it is convenient to keep clear whether the income so far the year is $822,141 or $787,094, and why the two numbers are different.
For the current year, on the income side the internal report is somewhat less positive than the FEC filings are. The Quarter numbers are cumulative for the year to date. In particular
FEC To-date LNC to-date
Q3 2009
Income
Outgo 796 807 762 487
Q2 2009
Income 556 857 522 704
Outgo 524 932 505 374
Q1 2009
Income 290 671 256 669
Outgo 266 019 241 900
2008
Income 1 669 047 1 637 139
Outgo 1 779 028 1 803 580
Income 1 454 411 1 613 727
Outgo 1 346 854 1 337 686
2006
Income 1 277 215 1 289 792
Outgo 1 257 274 1 246 585
2005
Income 1 337 702 1 367 329
Outgo 1 394 063 1 497 666
There are various accounting process for describing the same situation, so there is no indication of impropriety here, but it is certainly interesting how a change in perspective can have a considerable effect on nominal income or outgo.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Mon Dec 21, 2009 at 20:09:48 PM MST
|
(AuGeo is pleased to promote this announcement, which Forwarder recovered from the pages of Lee Wrights' Liberty For All. - promoted by AuGeo)
The New Path: A Renaissance for Our Libertarian Party
...by George Phillies
Our Libertarian Party stands at its golden moment. American voters are disgusted with their major parties, the parties of perpetual war, perpetual crony bailouts, and perpetual expansion of our national debt. They know Washington politicians don't care what their constituents think.
The people of America crave an alternative. That's us. That's our Libertarian Party, the Party of Common Sense.
Our opportunities stand right before us.
All we need to do is to reach out and take them.
We need to show America we are the Party of Good Sense. We do that by running on issues that people care about, issues like Peace, Opportunity, and Liberty.
*Peace? End the Asian Land Wars. Bring our troops home to their families.
*Opportunity? End Washington fiscal profligacy. Stop bailing out the crooked cronies of a corrupt Congress.
*Liberty? Shut down the warfare surveillance state.
That's our Common Sense Libertarian message.
Yes, we're Libertarians. We thrive on civil disagreement. We need a National Committee ready and able to fight our real opponents.
Some Libertarians ask: Do we really need 50-state ballot access? I say: My goal is thriving Libertarian Parties for every state, D.C., Puerto Rico, Guam, and everywhere else our flag flies.
Some Libertarians talk about fund raising. I say: Talk about fund spending! Spend our money on public outreach. Spend our money on local organization. ABOVE ALL, spend our money to elect candidates. Spend our money effectively, and our donors will reward us ten-fold.
Some Libertarians talk about purity tests. I say: Leave purity tests to high school students. Elect an LNC that wants to do work.
Some Libertarians fear a takeover. I say: We need a make-over. Bring small-L libertarians into our party. Embrace the anti-war coalitions that Republicans and Democrats hate. Greet the GLBTQ activists Obama and McCain scorn. Welcome women's rights supporters double-crossed by Congressional liberals.
Some Libertarians mobilize for platform debates. I say: Yes, Mobilize the Libertarians. Mobilize our fellow Libertarians to do real politics.
How do we do that? We need a national party leadership with a vision for the future. We need a national party leadership with sensible plans. We need a national party leadership with fire in its belly. We need a national party leadership willing to work for our party.
I'm delighted to see that across America good Libertarians are announcing their intent to run for our National Committee. They share a glorious objective: Put our Libertarian party on the New Path, the path to Libertarian Renaissance.
Last week, Angela Keaton used the pages of Liberty For All to urge me to run for National Chair. This week, Eva Kosinski used Gold America Group to do the same. Since then, I've been deluged with words of encouragement.
Let me paraphrase a distinguished foreign leader, many of whose fellow nationals and their descendants are now fine Americans: My life is but a feather. My duty to my party is a crushing mountain. Mindful of the words of my fellow libertarians, I find I have no alternative: I must shoulder this burden.
I hereby announce that I am a candidate for National Chair of our Party.
|
|
Discuss
:: (1
Comments)
|
|
Sat Dec 19, 2009 at 10:05:22 AM MST
|
|
Forwarder offers from Liberty for America magazine a Report on LNC spending during October 2009.
The following numbers are based on the Libertarian National Committee FEC reports, primarily for the October reporting period. There are also the financial reports supplied the LNC by the Treasurer, which show at certain key points some very different numbers. Given the miracles or modern accounting, it does not follow that one of the sets of numbers is wrong, but readers should realize that in accounting reports truth can be multivalued. A separate article treats the large differences between the LNC internal and FEC financial reports.
The Libertarian National Committee began October with $28512.27 cash on hand, had Total Receipts of $92044.55 and Total Disbursements of $95036.04, and closed October -- the November reporting period -- with $25520.78 cash on hand. For the year to date, total income was $914185.78, while total disbursements were $891843.48. A projection forward to the end of the year suggests an income for the year of $1.15 million, give or take, which is about $40,000 less than the 2009 draft budget.
So where did that money go?
Answered Below Fold
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 703 words in story)
|
|
Sun Dec 13, 2009 at 07:34:13 AM MST
|
|
Forwarder forwards from GoldMassGroup an article "Libertarian Joe Kennedy" from GoldMassGroup author AuMass. AuMass discusses whether it was good that Joe Kennedy is actually running on the Liberty party line, or whether he should have tried to run on the Libertarian line (where he would likely not have gained ballot access). AuMass concludes with a reference to critics of the approach.
Quoting Red Mass Group, thoughtful author YankeePundit
The Globe reports that Coakley wants to have three way debates with Scott Brown and Libertarian Joe Kennedy. ...
Clearly her hope is that Kennedy as a Libertarian ...
But I wonder if having the Libertarian Kennedy there ...
Important point: Joe is actually running on the Liberty Party line, but everyone knows he is a Libertarian, and that is how he is being described.
The press and blog descriptions are far more important than the half-noticed word on the ballot.
Conclusion: The real Libertarian message will go out as Libertarian whenever we get candidates on the ballot, even if the party name on the nominating paper is a bit different.
On the other hand, fighting for the 'Libertarian' word on the ballot gets you almost nothing unless, of course, you are looking to be paid for collecting signatures, and have a candidate who can afford the substantial extra tab, in which case the outcome is instant jackpot.
Finally, referring to critics of Joe's successful approach, reasoning from athletic analogies is seen not to lead to the right answers.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Sat Dec 05, 2009 at 21:43:03 PM MST
|
|
Forwarder: I have received from Rob Power the announcement that he is running for Platform Committee Chair, because the other candidate refuses to allow teleconference participation by a committee member unable to attend the meeting.
I still contend that Robert's is very clear that its rules are meant to give all members an opportunity to be heard in an orderly and efficient manner, and that none of its rules should ever be construed as a way to silence a member entirely. I believe trying to use Robert's to exclude the participation of a member who could easily be allowed to participate is an improper use of the rules, by Robert's own definition.
So, since it seems clear that if she is elected chair of this committee, Alicia will rule a motion to allow teleconference participation out of order, and even rule my appeal of that ruling out of order, we'll just have to vote on this issue by proxy.
I therefore announce that I am running for chair of this 2010 LP platform committee. If you want to have a vote on whether to allow our members to participate by telephone, vote for me, and we will have the vote on telephone participation. If you don't want to have that vote, then vote for Alicia (or Aaron, or anyone else who refuses to allow a vote on this issue), and they will keep such a vote from happening.
There. That was easy. :-)
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Fri Dec 04, 2009 at 20:17:49 PM MST
|
|
Forwarder writes: As extracted with some effort from George Phillies, an article on the LNC Draft Budget:
The new LNC draft budget, copies of which have been floating across my transom for some time now, proposes that in the coming year the LNC will
raise 1.14 million dollars
spend $293,000 to raise that 1.14 million dollars
have $845,000 left to spend on programs.
And what is in that program budget?
$334,000 to pay the staff
$406,000 in administrative costs, of which $36,000 for our attorney's retainer and $104,000 for information technology might involve doing politics, and $26,000 for printing, postage, and telephone could also have that effect. On the other hand, the $140,400 for a corner office in DC class A space does no politics at all.
Oh, activities:
$32,000 for printing the once--monthly newsletter on a quarterly basis
NOTHING for affiliate support
NOTHING for ballot access
NOTHING for brand development
NOTHING for campus outreach
NOTHING for candidate support
NOTHING for litigation
NOTHING for lobbying
NOTHING for media relations
NOTHING for outreach
The notion "volunteer activism is an activity" is apparently so alien that volunteer activism is not even mentioned as an expenditure not being funded.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 362 words in story)
|
|
Fri Dec 04, 2009 at 20:13:15 PM MST
|
|
San Francisco, California, December 4, 2009. Rob Power today announced his candidacy for Libertarian National Committee Secretary.
"The time is right for us Libertarians to adopt a new strategy," Mr. Power said. "Our Party is unique in its longstanding rejection of perpetual war, central planning, and government favoring certain classes of individuals over others. After nearly a decade of war for which most Americans now realize there was never any national security interest, and years into a recession prolonged by federal government policies, voters have caught up to the Libertarian Party's longtime understanding about the nature of big government. Even those who have long shared our skepticism of Washington DC's ability to solve society's problems have recently come to the realization that their former 'allies' - the religious right - cannot be trusted to oppose the growth of government, especially when their operatives are elected to office. If our message of individual liberty and personal responsibility is to gain any traction in these key demographics who are most open to our recruitment, the Libertarian Party must have a new generation of leadership, rejecting social conservatism and reaching out in their own terms to those voters who may have lost their faith in big government only very recently."
"We've heard that several internal problems, with our Platform, our Bylaws, or certain interest groups, have been what's holding our Party back. Thus, great internal effort has been expended to gut our platform, centralize executive power in our Bylaws, and purge certain longtime constituents from our Party. It didn't help us at all. Our true obstacles are a lack of ballot access, indifference or even hostility from the mainstream media, caricatures of Libertarians and our principles - often by those within our Party - and a focus on making our Party look more and more like the less successful of the two major parties. Nothing about the obstacles we face has changed in four decades. These are old problems, and it's long past time for new solutions. We must stop scapegoating our own Platform, Bylaws, and respected Party Founders, and instead realize that the opposition is outside, not inside, by implementing new technologies and new ideas to bypass media and ballot access roadblocks and recruit new members and activists. We also must learn that donors like to know where their money is going, and reliance on blind generosity is an unwise strategy for fundraising. Finally, we must 'walk the talk' and actively campaign to stop and reverse the trend of increasing obstacles to ballot access."
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 761 words in story)
|
|
Thu Nov 26, 2009 at 10:19:03 AM MST
|
|
Forwarder: Here is another of George Phillies' Letters on libertarian Strategy, discussing what local groups could be doing to advance our political movement.
In previous letters, I discussed activities particularly appropriate for performance by national and state groups. I have also discussed activities that every Libertarian group should perform, most notably incitement of members to become activists and candidates.
In this letter, I consider activities most appropriate for local Libertarian groups. These are the activities that you and your Libertarian neighbors have to do for yourselves, because a distant committee in Washington cannot fo them for you.
Above all, the foundation of Libertarian victory is Local Organization. Local Organization gives us the local politicians who later rise to state and Federal office. Local Organization gives us Libertarian activists in every ward and precinct, in every city and town, who will put up lawn signs, distribute push cards, man phone banks, and get out the Libertarian vote on election day. Remember:
* Campaigns are won on the local level. In the words of the Virginia Libertarian party "let us accept the proposition that every precinct in which a Libertarian resides shall have a precinct captain." Philadelphia activists have shown how well the local organization approach can work. In a recent three-way race, the Libertarian candidate carried the districts in which the Libertarian Party was able to run a classic full-bore campaign.
* Local organizations give personal contact. Many people will write a check for a candidate they have never met. If you want those people to volunteer their time to support that same candidate, you need someone who knows them personally. That someone is placed to ask them personally, face-to-face to Stand Up for Liberty! and become a Libertarian activist. That old stand-by, the Libertarian Supper club, can be an effective way to develop local contacts, if it is used properly. A supper club is a wonderful way to meet fellow Libertarians, deepen one's understanding of the Libertarian message, and have a good time. For a dedicated Party member, the very same supper club can be an opportunity to incite your fellow members into activism, thereby using the Supper Club as a recruiting station for the army of freedom.
* Local Organizations run local candidates, the people who enter races we are likely to win. Local candidates reinforce each other's strengths; each Libertarian campaign builds votes for every future Libertarian candidate. Local organizations get us elected Libertarians.
* Libertarians in local office build the voter base. Elected Libertarians get to show the public what the Libertarian Party stands for. Elected Libertarians provide an updraft for other Libertarian candidates, giving them a base of strength they cannot get any other way.
Local Organization is the path to a Libertarian future.
|
|
Discuss
:: (0
Comments)
|
|
Sun Nov 22, 2009 at 18:38:51 PM MST
|
|
Forwarder writes: Rhys Blavier is a Texas Libertarian. He writes here on Libertarian Party strategy and missed opportunities in 2009. This article appeared previously in Lee Wrights' Liberty for All http://LibertyForAll.net Blavier writes:
Election Day 2009 has come and gone. Relatively speaking, this election was as insignificant as any off-year election is, as opposed to a mid-term election, but it still could have been an important year for the Libertarian Party, if we had simply bothered to show up. There were six elections / ballot initiatives which could have possibly been affected by the Libertarian Party... if we actually had a long-term strategic plan. As it is, some things happened for which it is notable that the LP had no role in. In no particular order, let's look at where we could have had real impacts this year.
Governor's Race - New Jersey: New Jersey voters tossed out their incumbent Democratic Governor, Corizine, in favor of Republican Chris Christie. It may have happened because Corizine is very unpopular with the citizens of his government-corruption prone state .While Christie's election is not necessarily a bad thing, what made this election notable was that it swung on independent voters. Christie won 49% of the vote, Corizine won 44% and independent candidate Chris Dagget walked away with 5% of the vote.
Continued below the fold:
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 1818 words in story)
|
|
Fri Nov 20, 2009 at 20:04:19 PM MST
|
|
Forwarder writes: George Phillies sends us his take on the 2009 elections; an earlier version of this article appeared in Liberty for America magazine.
There is some really good news out there politically. America has a two-party electoral system, meaning that third parties such as ours have problems with winning elections. Fortunately, the national Republican Party is preparing to get out of our way by committing political suicide and transforming itself into a regional party of eccentrics, namely the Party of Southern Sectarian Christian White Male Conservatives. Liberal Democrats have proposed for them a new political mascot: GOPY the Gopasaurus, a red-white-and-blue dinosaur speeding to extinction.
|
|
There's More...
:: (0
Comments, 693 words in story)
|
|
|
|
|
| About |
|
Gold America Group is the open blog for sensible, polite, discussion of libertarian political activity and the libertarian political movement. Participation by all libertarians prepared to be polite to each other is invited.
To participate, you must make a new account. There is an automatic waiting period before you can post.
|
|